Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen Embedded V2748

Intel

Core i7-10700K

8 Cores16 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2748

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.25 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen Embedded V2748: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10700K

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +19.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Embedded V2748 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 59.7 PassMark/$ ($387 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
  • 177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.

Ryzen Embedded V2748

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $78 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $387 MSRP).
  • Delivers 24.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.7 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $387 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,561).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10700K better than Ryzen Embedded V2748?
Yes. Core i7-10700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-10700K is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-10700K comes in 25.2% more expensive on MSRP at $387 MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V2748 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 19.7% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-10700K

The Core i7-10700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,561 points. Launch price was $400.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2748

The Ryzen Embedded V2748 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.25 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-10700K and Ryzen Embedded V2748 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-10700K versus 4.25 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2748 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-10700K uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700K scores 18,561 against the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 18,434 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-10700K. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2748.

FeatureCore i7-10700KRyzen Embedded V2748
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+20%
4.25 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+31%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+100%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark
18,561
18,434
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,144
Geekbench 6 Single
1,290
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,404
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10700K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-10700KRyzen Embedded V2748
Socket
LGA1200
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-10700K) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2748). The Core i7-10700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700K targets Gaming/Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700K rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureCore i7-10700KRyzen Embedded V2748
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-10700K was priced at $387, while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 came in at $309. On launch pricing ($387 vs $309), Ryzen Embedded V2748 was $78 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700K delivers 48.0 pts/$ vs 59.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2748 — making the Ryzen Embedded V2748 the 21.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-10700KRyzen Embedded V2748
MSRP
$387
$309-20%
Performance per Dollar
48.0
59.7+24%
Release Date
2020
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.