
Core i7-10700KF

Core Ultra 5 225U
Core i7-10700KF vs Core Ultra 5 225U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10700KF vs Core Ultra 5 225U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10700KF vs Core Ultra 5 225U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10700KF
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,380 vs 18,434).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $405 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌792.9% higher power demand at 125W vs 14W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 125W, a 111W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Core i7-10700KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225U better than Core i7-10700KF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10700KF vs Core Ultra 5 225U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700KF
The Core i7-10700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,380 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 5 225U
The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10700KF packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-10700KF versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700KF (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-10700KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225U uses Arrow Lake-U (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700KF scores 18,380 against the Core Ultra 5 225U's 18,434 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700KF vs 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 14+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+6% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Arrow Lake-U (2025) |
| PassMark | 18,380 | 18,434 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,374 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,846 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-10700KF) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Core i7-10700KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | — | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













