
Core i7-10700KF
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-10700KF
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.4 vs 124.4 PassMark/$ ($405 MSRP vs $146 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $259 less on MSRP ($146 MSRP vs $405 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 124.4 vs 45.4 PassMark/$ ($146 MSRP vs $405 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,169 vs 18,380).
Core i7-10700KF
2020Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $259 less on MSRP ($146 MSRP vs $405 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 124.4 vs 45.4 PassMark/$ ($146 MSRP vs $405 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.4 vs 124.4 PassMark/$ ($405 MSRP vs $146 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,169 vs 18,380).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700KF better than Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 361 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10700KF and Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE

Core i7-10700KF
Core i7-10700KF
The Core i7-10700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,380 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,169 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10700KF packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10700KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-10700KF versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700KF (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-10700KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700KF scores 18,380 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE's 18,169 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-10700KF. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700KF vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+16% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 18,380+1% | 18,169 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-10700KF launched at $405 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE debuted at $146. On MSRP ($405 vs $146), the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE is $259 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700KF delivers 45.4 pts/$ vs 124.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE the 93.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $405 | $146-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4 | 124.4+174% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











