Core i7-10750H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10750H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10750H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10750H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 85W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2630 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10750H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,434 vs 11,545).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,171 MSRP, while Core i7-10750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌88.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10750H better than Xeon E5-2630 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2630 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-10750H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10750H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10750H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10750H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2630 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-10750H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,171 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2630 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-10750H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-10750H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10750H

The Core i7-10750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,545 points. Launch price was $435.

Xeon E5-2630 v4

The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,434 points. Launch price was $667.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-10750H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-10750H versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-10750H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-10750H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10750H scores 11,545 against the Xeon E5-2630 v4's 11,434 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-10750H. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-10750H vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630 v4.

Feature	Core i7-10750H	Xeon E5-2630 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+61%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+18%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	25 MB+213%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+10140%	2.5 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	11,545	11,434
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,032
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,368

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10750H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-10750H	Xeon E5-2630 v4
Socket	BGA1440	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4 1600/1866/2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-10750H) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E5-2630 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v4 targets Workstation / Server.