
Core i7-10870H
Popular choices:

Core i9-9980HK
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-10870H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-9980HK needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i9-9980HK
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,966 vs 14,087).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10870H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-10870H
2020Core i9-9980HK
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-9980HK needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,966 vs 14,087).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10870H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10870H better than Core i9-9980HK?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-10870H | Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-10870H | Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-10870H | Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 322 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-10870H | Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10870H and Core i9-9980HK

Core i7-10870H
Core i7-10870H
The Core i7-10870H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,087 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i9-9980HK
Core i9-9980HK
The Core i9-9980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,966 points. Launch price was $583.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-10870H and Core i9-9980HK share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10870H versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-9980HK — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-9980HK (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-10870H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-9980HK uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10870H scores 14,087 against the Core i9-9980HK's 13,966 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-10870H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10870H vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980HK.
| Feature | Core i7-10870H | Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) |
| PassMark | 14,087 | 13,966 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,594 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,228 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,822 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the BGA1440 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-10870H | Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10870H) / not specified (Core i9-9980HK). The Core i7-10870H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-9980HK requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10870H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10870H rivals Ryzen 7 4800H.
| Feature | Core i7-10870H | Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












