Core i7-10870H vs Core i9-9980HK

Intel

Core i7-10870H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i9-9980HK

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-10870H

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i9-9980HK needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i9-9980HK

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,966 vs 14,087).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10870H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10870H better than Core i9-9980HK?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i9-9980HK is ahead with a 15.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10870H pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Core i9-9980HK also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10870H is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-10870H is the smarter buy today. Core i7-10870H is at an unclear MSRP at $417 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i9-9980HK is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (33.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10870H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-10870HCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low286 FPS271 FPS
medium256 FPS246 FPS
high217 FPS207 FPS
ultra187 FPS179 FPS
1440p
low235 FPS235 FPS
medium189 FPS193 FPS
high155 FPS158 FPS
ultra137 FPS139 FPS
4K
low164 FPS165 FPS
medium133 FPS137 FPS
high103 FPS106 FPS
ultra91 FPS93 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-10870HCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low253 FPS349 FPS
medium208 FPS349 FPS
high193 FPS349 FPS
ultra172 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low217 FPS349 FPS
medium183 FPS349 FPS
high171 FPS349 FPS
ultra149 FPS323 FPS
4K
low171 FPS349 FPS
medium148 FPS310 FPS
high141 FPS291 FPS
ultra122 FPS245 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-10870HCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low352 FPS349 FPS
medium352 FPS349 FPS
high352 FPS349 FPS
ultra352 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low352 FPS349 FPS
medium352 FPS349 FPS
high352 FPS349 FPS
ultra352 FPS349 FPS
4K
low352 FPS349 FPS
medium352 FPS349 FPS
high352 FPS349 FPS
ultra325 FPS322 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-10870HCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low352 FPS349 FPS
medium352 FPS349 FPS
high352 FPS349 FPS
ultra352 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low352 FPS349 FPS
medium352 FPS349 FPS
high352 FPS349 FPS
ultra352 FPS349 FPS
4K
low352 FPS349 FPS
medium352 FPS349 FPS
high352 FPS349 FPS
ultra352 FPS349 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10870H and Core i9-9980HK

Intel

Core i7-10870H

The Core i7-10870H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,087 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i9-9980HK

The Core i9-9980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,966 points. Launch price was $583.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-10870H and Core i9-9980HK share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10870H versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-9980HK — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-9980HK (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-10870H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-9980HK uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10870H scores 14,087 against the Core i9-9980HK's 13,966 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-10870H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10870H vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980HK.

FeatureCore i7-10870HCore i9-9980HK
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-H (2020)
Coffee Lake-HR (2019)
PassMark
14,087
13,966
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,594
Geekbench 6 Single
1,228
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,822
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1440 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCore i7-10870HCore i9-9980HK
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10870H) / not specified (Core i9-9980HK). The Core i7-10870H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i9-9980HK requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10870H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10870H rivals Ryzen 7 4800H.

FeatureCore i7-10870HCore i9-9980HK
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming