
Core i7-10870H

Xeon W-2235
Core i7-10870H vs Xeon W-2235 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10870H vs Xeon W-2235 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10870H vs Xeon W-2235: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10870H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $138 less on MSRP ($417 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,087 vs 14,235).
Xeon W-2235
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10870H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.6 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($555 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10870H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10870H better than Xeon W-2235?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10870H vs Xeon W-2235 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10870H
The Core i7-10870H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,087 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-2235
The Xeon W-2235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,235 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10870H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2235 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10870H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10870H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-2235 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-10870H (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-10870H is built on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-10870H scores 14,087 against the Xeon W-2235's 14,235 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W-2235. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10870H vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon W-2235.
| Feature | Core i7-10870H | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+4% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+73% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+45% | 8.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | — |
| PassMark | 14,087 | 14,235+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,594 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,228 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,822 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10870H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2235 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10870H | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10870H) / not specified (Xeon W-2235). The Core i7-10870H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon W-2235 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10870H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10870H rivals Ryzen 7 4800H.
| Feature | Core i7-10870H | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-10870H was priced at $417, while the Xeon W-2235 came in at $555. On launch pricing ($417 vs $555), Core i7-10870H was $138 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10870H delivers 33.8 pts/$ vs 25.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2235 — making the Core i7-10870H the 27.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-10870H | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $417-25% | $555 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8+32% | 25.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














