PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11700 vs Core i9-13900TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11700 vs Core i9-13900TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11700

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 63.9 vs 37.2 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i9-13900TE.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 36 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i9-13900TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,602 vs 20,625).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 63.9 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-11700.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900TE better than Core i7-11700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-13900TE is ahead with a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-11700 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i9-13900TE also has the bigger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-11700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900TE is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-11700 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-13900TE comes in 71.5% more expensive on MSRP at $554 MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-11700 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i7-11700 is also 71.7% better value on MSRP (63.9 vs 37.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i7-11700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and 125% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-11700 vs Core i9-13900TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11700

The Core i7-11700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,625 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i9-13900TE

The Core i9-13900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,602 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-13900TE offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900TE has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-11700 versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-13900TE — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900TE (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core i7-11700 uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-13900TE uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11700 scores 20,625 against the Core i9-13900TE's 20,602 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-11700. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-11700 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900TE.

Feature	Core i7-11700	Core i9-13900TE
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 32+200%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+150%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	20,625	20,602

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11700 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-13900TE uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11700 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900TE — the Core i9-13900TE supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i7-11700) and LGA1700 (Core i9-13900TE).

Feature	Core i7-11700	Core i9-13900TE
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+75%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 750 (Core i7-11700) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-11700 rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	Core i7-11700	Core i9-13900TE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 750	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-11700 was priced at $323, while the Core i9-13900TE came in at $554. On launch pricing ($323 vs $554), Core i7-11700 was $231 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-11700 delivers 63.9 pts/$ vs 37.2 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900TE — making the Core i7-11700 the 52.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-11700	Core i9-13900TE
MSRP	$323-42%	$554
Performance per Dollar	63.9+72%	37.2
Release Date	2021	2023

Search Core i7-11700 on Amazon

Search Core i9-13900TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.