
Core i7-11700B

Xeon W-11955M
Core i7-11700B vs Xeon W-11955M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-11700B vs Xeon W-11955M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-11700B vs Xeon W-11955M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-11700B
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.8 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 750, while Xeon W-11955M needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,581 vs 21,702).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 66.8 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11700B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11955M better than Core i7-11700B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-11700B vs Xeon W-11955M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11700B
The Core i7-11700B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: Up to 3200 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 21,581 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-11700B and Xeon W-11955M share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11700B versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture using a 10 nm SuperFin process. In PassMark, the Core i7-11700B scores 21,581 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-11955M. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-11700B | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+52% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,581 | 21,702 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,287 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,265 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,050 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FCBGA1787 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Core i7-11700B | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-11700B) / not specified (Xeon W-11955M). The Core i7-11700B includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 750), while the Xeon W-11955M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11700B targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-11700B | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-11700B was priced at $323, while the Xeon W-11955M came in at $623. On launch pricing ($323 vs $623), Core i7-11700B was $300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-11700B delivers 66.8 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11955M — making the Core i7-11700B the 62.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-11700B | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $323-48% | $623 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.8+92% | 34.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















