Core i7-1180G7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1180G7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1180G7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1180G7

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 85W, a 76W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon E5-2620 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620 v3, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 4.
✅900% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,734 vs 7,788).
❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Core i7-1180G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌844.4% higher power demand at 85W vs 9W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1180G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1180G7 better than Xeon E5-2620 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2620 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1180G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-1180G7 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1180G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1180G7 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2620 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-1180G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2620 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1180G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-1180G7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1180G7

The Core i7-1180G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,788 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,734 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1180G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-1180G7 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-1180G7 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-1180G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1180G7 scores 7,788 against the Xeon E5-2620 v3's 7,734 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-1180G7. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1180G7 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v3.

Feature	Core i7-1180G7	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+44%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	7,788	7,734
Geekbench 6 Single	1,845	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1180G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1180G7 versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — the Core i7-1180G7 supports 128.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2620 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-1180G7) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2620 v3). PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i7-1180G7) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2620 v3) — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-UP4 (Core i7-1180G7) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v3).

Feature	Core i7-1180G7	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Socket	FCBGA1598	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267+129%	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	768 GB+2300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	40+900%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1180G7) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2620 v3). The Core i7-1180G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1180G7 targets Premium Ultra-Thin Laptop, Xeon E5-2620 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-1180G7 rivals Ryzen 7 5800U.

Feature	Core i7-1180G7	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Premium Ultra-Thin Laptop	Server