
Core i7-12650HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12650HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 23,215).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12650HX
2022Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 23,215).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Core i7-12650HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12650HX and Ryzen 5 7640HS

Core i7-12650HX
Core i7-12650HX
The Core i7-12650HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,215 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12650HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-12650HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12650HX versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i7-12650HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12650HX scores 23,215 against the Ryzen 5 7640HS's 22,921 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-12650HX. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-12650HX vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+115% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-HX (2022) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 23,215+1% | 22,921 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12650HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12650HX) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7640HS). The Core i7-12650HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12650HX targets Gaming Laptop.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












