
Core i7-12650HX

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Core i7-12650HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-12650HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-12650HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-12650HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen Threadripper 1920X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,150 vs 23,215).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Core i7-12650HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-12650HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12650HX better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-12650HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-12650HX
The Core i7-12650HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,215 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12650HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-12650HX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12650HX versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12650HX (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-12650HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12650HX scores 23,215 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-12650HX. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-12650HX vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+12% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-HX (2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 23,215 | 23,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12650HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12650HX) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920X). The Core i7-12650HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12650HX targets Gaming Laptop.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













