
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-10900E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 112.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core i9-10900E
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-12700K
2021Core i9-10900E
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 112.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core i9-10900E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 389 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Core i9-10900E

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-10900E
Core i9-10900E
The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-10900E offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-10900E uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Core i9-10900E's 19,332 — a 55.9% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+20% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+6% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+25% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,347+78% | 19,332 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10900E uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900E — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 16 (Core i9-10900E) — the Core i7-12700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and LGA1200 (Core i9-10900E).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10900E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900E debuted at $488. On MSRP ($409 vs $488), the Core i7-12700K is $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 39.6 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900E — making the Core i7-12700K the 71.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-10900E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-16% | $488 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+112% | 39.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













