
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-13900T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 42,735).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Core i9-13900T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$409 MSRP
Core i7-12700K
2021Core i9-13900T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 42,735).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$409 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900T better than Core i7-12700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 112 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 761 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 328 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 1004 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 897 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 785 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 833 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 733 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 640 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Core i9-13900T

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-13900T
Core i9-13900T
The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-13900T offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900T (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-13900T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Core i9-13900T's 42,735 — a 21.8% lead for the Core i9-13900T. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 24 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.3 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+227% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+44% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 42,735+24% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus 5600 on the Core i9-13900T — the Core i9-13900T supports 15.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900T supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 5600+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 192+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-13900T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900T debuted at $549. On MSRP ($409 vs $549), the Core i7-12700K is $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 77.8 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900T — making the Core i7-12700K the 7.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i9-13900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-26% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+8% | 77.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













