
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 7702
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,041 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 684.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 69,060).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7702, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7702
2019Why buy it
- ✅+101.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+924% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($6,450 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021EPYC 7702
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,041 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 684.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+101.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+924% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 69,060).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7702, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($6,450 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than EPYC 7702?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7702 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7702 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 84 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7702 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7702 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 823 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 706 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 711 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 343 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and EPYC 7702

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
The EPYC 7702 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,060 points. Launch price was $6,450.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7702 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7702 has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702 — a 39.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7702 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the EPYC 7702's 69,060 — a 67.1% lead for the EPYC 7702. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7702 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 64 / 128+433% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+49% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+924% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 69,060+101% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7702 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus 3200 on the EPYC 7702 — the Core i7-12700K supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7702 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 8 (EPYC 7702). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 128 (EPYC 7702) — the EPYC 7702 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and SP3 (EPYC 7702).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7702 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7702 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 7702 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7702 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 7702 debuted at $6450. On MSRP ($409 vs $6450), the Core i7-12700K is $6041 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 7702 — making the Core i7-12700K the 154.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7702 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-94% | $6450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+685% | 10.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













