
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 9334
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,581 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 283.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 210W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9334 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 65,568).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9334
2022Why buy it
- ✅+90.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+412% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌68% higher power demand at 210W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021EPYC 9334
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,581 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 283.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 210W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9334 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+90.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+412% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 65,568).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌68% higher power demand at 210W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9334 better than Core i7-12700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 208 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 856 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 786 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 678 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 336 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and EPYC 9334

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334
The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 9334 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 62.5% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+28% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+412% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 65,568+91% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9334 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 12 (EPYC 9334). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 128 (EPYC 9334) — the EPYC 9334 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 6144+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9334 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 9334 debuted at $2990. On MSRP ($409 vs $2990), the Core i7-12700K is $2581 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the Core i7-12700K the 117.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-86% | $2990 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+284% | 21.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













