
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅+20.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,538 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Core i7-12700K
2021Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+20.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,538 vs 34,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Core i7-12700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 713 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 357 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 713 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 713 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Ryzen 7 7840HS

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 18.5% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+56% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 34,347+20% | 28,538 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,854 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 256 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | — | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












