
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 3900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 61.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 3900 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 3900.
Ryzen 9 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,588 vs 34,347).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.3 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021Ryzen 9 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 61.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 3900 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 3900.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,588 vs 34,347).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.3 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Ryzen 9 3900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 213 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 765 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 711 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 638 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 360 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Ryzen 9 3900

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 3900's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3900 uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Ryzen 9 3900's 30,588 — a 11.6% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+16% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 64 MB+156% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 34,347+12% | 30,588 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,713 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,983 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 3900 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900 — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3900) — the Ryzen 9 3900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 9 3900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power). Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation Desktop (low power) |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 3900 debuted at $499. On MSRP ($409 vs $499), the Core i7-12700K is $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 61.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 3900 — making the Core i7-12700K the 31.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-18% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+37% | 61.3 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












