
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6346
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,299 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 502.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 37,739).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6346, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6346
2021Why buy it
- ✅+9.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021Xeon Gold 6346
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,299 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 502.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+9.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 37,739).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6346, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Xeon Gold 6346?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 943 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 856 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 810 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 719 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 673 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 943 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 918 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 790 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 670 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 819 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Xeon Gold 6346

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Gold 6346
Xeon Gold 6346
The Xeon Gold 6346 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 37,739 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6346 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6346 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6346 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Xeon Gold 6346's 37,739 — a 9.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6346. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6346.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+39% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+44% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 37,739+10% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6346 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6346 — the Core i7-12700K supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6346 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6346). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6346) — the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6346).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 6144+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6346 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6346 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Xeon Gold 6346 rivals EPYC 73F3.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6346 debuted at $2708. On MSRP ($409 vs $2708), the Core i7-12700K is $2299 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6346 — making the Core i7-12700K the 143.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-85% | $2708 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+504% | 13.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













