Core i7-12700KF vs EPYC 4364P

Intel

Core i7-12700KF

12 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5 GHz2021
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 4364P

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······

Core i7-12700KF vs EPYC 4364P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-12700KF vs EPYC 4364P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-12700KF vs EPYC 4364P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-12700KF

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $15 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (34,056 vs 34,215).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
  • 19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.

EPYC 4364P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
  • 40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 3.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$384 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4364P better than Core i7-12700KF?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4364P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-12700KF is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4364P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4364P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4364P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-12700KF is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4364P comes in 3.9% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $384 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-12700KF is also 3.4% better value on MSRP (88.7 vs 85.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4364P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-12700KF vs EPYC 4364P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-12700KF

The Core i7-12700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,056 points. Launch price was $384.

AMD

EPYC 4364P

The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.

Processing Power

The Core i7-12700KF packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 4364P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-12700KF has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700KF versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P — a 7.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i7-12700KF uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4364P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700KF scores 34,056 against the EPYC 4364P's 34,215 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 4364P. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700KF vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P.

FeatureCore i7-12700KFEPYC 4364P
Cores / Threads
12 / 20+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.4 GHz+8%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
25 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+28%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark
34,056
34,215
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,085
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,594
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-12700KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4364P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700KF versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P — the EPYC 4364P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700KF) vs 28 (EPYC 4364P) — the EPYC 4364P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700KF) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P).

FeatureCore i7-12700KFEPYC 4364P
Socket
LGA1700
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800
DDR5-5200+8%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
192 GB+50%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-12700KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4364P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700KF) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P). The EPYC 4364P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i7-12700KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700KF rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.

FeatureCore i7-12700KFEPYC 4364P
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
Entry Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-12700KF was priced at $384, while the EPYC 4364P came in at $399. On launch pricing ($384 vs $399), Core i7-12700KF was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700KF delivers 88.7 pts/$ vs 85.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4364P — making the Core i7-12700KF the 3.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-12700KFEPYC 4364P
MSRP
$384-4%
$399
Performance per Dollar
88.7+3%
85.8
Release Date
2021
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.