
Core i7-12700KF
Popular choices:

EPYC 7302
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $594 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 158.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700KF across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,499 vs 34,056).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 88.7 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ❌24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-12700KF
2021EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $594 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 158.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700KF across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,499 vs 34,056).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 88.7 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ❌24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700KF better than EPYC 7302?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700KF | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700KF | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 123 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700KF | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 475 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700KF | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 851 FPS | 821 FPS |
| medium | 821 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 715 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 642 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 769 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 597 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 312 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700KF and EPYC 7302

Core i7-12700KF
Core i7-12700KF
The Core i7-12700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,056 points. Launch price was $384.

EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302
The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700KF packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7302 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700KF versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 — a 41% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700KF (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-12700KF uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7302 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700KF scores 34,056 against the EPYC 7302's 33,499 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-12700KF. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700KF vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Core i7-12700KF | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+52% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+28% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 34,056+2% | 33,499 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 19,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,192 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,254 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7302 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700KF versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 — the Core i7-12700KF supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700KF) vs 8 (EPYC 7302). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700KF) vs 128 (EPYC 7302) — the EPYC 7302 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700KF) and WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302).
| Feature | Core i7-12700KF | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096 GB+3355443100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700KF) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302). Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700KF rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | Core i7-12700KF | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | — | Server / Multi-thread Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700KF launched at $384 MSRP, while the EPYC 7302 debuted at $978. On MSRP ($384 vs $978), the Core i7-12700KF is $594 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700KF delivers 88.7 pts/$ vs 34.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7302 — making the Core i7-12700KF the 88.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700KF | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-61% | $978 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.7+159% | 34.3 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













