PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-12800HX vs Xeon W-3245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-12800HX vs Xeon W-3245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-12800HX

2022

Why buy it

✅+3.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon W-3245 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 18,680).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,199 MSRP, while Core i7-12800HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-12800HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12800HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-12800HX better than Xeon W-3245?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3245 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-12800HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12800HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-12800HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3245 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-12800HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon W-3245 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3245 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-12800HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-12800HX vs Xeon W-3245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-12800HX

The Core i7-12800HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,229 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3245

The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-12800HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon W-3245's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-12800HX versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-12800HX (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-12800HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12800HX scores 31,229 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-12800HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,680 vs 18,000 (3.7% advantage for the Core i7-12800HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,353, a 36.7% lead for the Core i7-12800HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 11,698 (24.7% advantage for the Core i7-12800HX). L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12800HX vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.

Feature	Core i7-12800HX	Xeon W-3245
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+4%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)+14%	22 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	16 MB+1180%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-HX (2022)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	31,229	31,089
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,680+4%	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962+45%	1,353
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000+28%	11,698

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-12800HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-12800HX versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 — the Core i7-12800HX supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12800HX) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12800HX) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM670,WM690 (Core i7-12800HX) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).

Feature	Core i7-12800HX	Xeon W-3245
Socket	FCBGA1964	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-12800HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3245 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i7-12800HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3245 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12800HX targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-12800HX rivals Ryzen 7 6800HX; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Core i7-12800HX	Xeon W-3245
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Extreme Gaming Laptop	Professional Workstation