Core i7-14700KF vs EPYC 9174F

Core i7-14700KF vs EPYC 9174F Performance Spectrum

Core i7-14700KF

20 / 28

52,231

0.0%

52,249

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-14700KF vs EPYC 9174F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-14700KF vs EPYC 9174F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-14700KF

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 320W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (52,231 vs 52,249).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9174F, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 136.0 vs 269.3 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).

EPYC 9174F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 269.3 vs 136.0 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌156% higher power demand at 320W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9174F better than Core i7-14700KF?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9174F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-14700KF is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9174F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 33 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9174F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 675.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9174F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9174F comes in $190 cheaper on MSRP at $194 MSRP versus $384 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 98.0% better value on MSRP (269.3 vs 136.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-14700KF makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-14700KF vs EPYC 9174F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-14700KF

The Core i7-14700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,231 points. Launch price was $384.

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700KF packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 9174F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i7-14700KF has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i7-14700KF versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F — a 24% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700KF (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i7-14700KF uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9174F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700KF scores 52,231 against the EPYC 9174F's 52,249 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700KF vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F.

Feature	Core i7-14700KF	EPYC 9174F
Cores / Threads	20 / 28+25%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+27%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	4.1 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+676%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	52,231	52,249
Cinebench R23 Multi	36,245	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,921	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	19,560	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9174F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700KF versus 4800 on the EPYC 9174F — the Core i7-14700KF supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700KF) vs 12 (EPYC 9174F). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700KF) vs 128 (EPYC 9174F) — the EPYC 9174F offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i7-14700KF) and SP5 (EPYC 9174F).

Feature	Core i7-14700KF	EPYC 9174F
Socket	LGA1700	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	6144 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-14700KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	Core i7-14700KF	EPYC 9174F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-14700KF was priced at $384, while the EPYC 9174F came in at $194. On launch pricing ($384 vs $194), EPYC 9174F was $190 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14700KF delivers 136.0 pts/$ vs 269.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9174F — making the EPYC 9174F the 65.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-14700KF	EPYC 9174F
MSRP	$384	$194-49%
Performance per Dollar	136.0	269.3+98%
Release Date	2023	2022

Search Core i7-14700KF on Amazon

Search EPYC 9174F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.