Core i7-14701E vs Xeon 6349P

Intel

Core i7-14701E

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon 6349P

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-14701E vs Xeon 6349P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-14701E vs Xeon 6349P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-14701E vs Xeon 6349P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-14701E

2024

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • +83.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6349P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $392 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon 6349P

2025

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (25,953 vs 26,146).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 33 MB).
    • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14701E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-14701E better than Xeon 6349P?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6349P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-14701E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14701E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 83.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 18 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-14701E is the better buy right now. Core i7-14701E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $392 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (66.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon 6349P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i7-14701E vs Xeon 6349P Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-14701E

    The Core i7-14701E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,146 points. Launch price was $299.

    Intel

    Xeon 6349P

    The Xeon 6349P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 25,953 points. Launch price was $509.

    Processing Power

    The Core i7-14701E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6349P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-14701E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14701E versus 5.4 GHz on the Xeon 6349P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-14701E scores 26,146 against the Xeon 6349P's 25,953 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-14701E. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14701E vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6349P.

    FeatureCore i7-14701EXeon 6349P
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 16+33%
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    5.4 GHz
    5.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.6 GHz
    3.6 GHz+38%
    L3 Cache
    33 MB (total)+83%
    18 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)+60%
    1.25 MB (per core)
    Process
    10 nm
    Intel 7 nm-30%
    Architecture
    Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
    Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
    PassMark
    26,146
    25,953
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,781
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

    FeatureCore i7-14701EXeon 6349P
    Socket
    LGA1700
    LGA1700
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-5600
    Max RAM Capacity
    192 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14701E) / not specified (Xeon 6349P). The Core i7-14701E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6349P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14701E targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-14701E rivals Ryzen Embedded 8000.

    FeatureCore i7-14701EXeon 6349P
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics 770
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    Target Use
    Embedded/Industrial