Core i7-2600 vs MediaTek Kompanio 838

Core i7-2600 vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2600

4 / 8

5,346

+0.1%

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 / 8

5,343

0.0%

Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 950

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i7-3632QM

Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2600 vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2600 vs MediaTek Kompanio 838: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2600

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike MediaTek Kompanio 838.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 838 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,343 vs 5,346).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-2600.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2600 better than MediaTek Kompanio 838?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, MediaTek Kompanio 838 is ahead with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2600 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2600 is the better buy right now. Core i7-2600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that MediaTek Kompanio 838 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-2600 vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2600

The Core i7-2600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,346 points. Launch price was $247.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2600 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600 versus 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 — a 53.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-2600 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024). In PassMark, the Core i7-2600 scores 5,346 against the MediaTek Kompanio 838's 5,343 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-2600.

Feature	Core i7-2600	MediaTek Kompanio 838
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+73%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+70%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm	—
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	5,346	5,343
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,648	—
Geekbench 6 Single	659	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,169	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2600) / not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 838). The Core i7-2600 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600 rivals FX-8350.