Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-4700EQ

Intel

Core i7-2600K

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-2600K

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $61 less on MSRP ($317 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($317 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4700EQ.

Trade-offs

  • 102.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 47W.

Core i7-4700EQ

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 47W instead of 95W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (5,417 vs 5,484).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 17.3 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $317 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-2600K.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2600K better than Core i7-4700EQ?
Yes. Core i7-2600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2600K is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-2600K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-2600K is $61 cheaper on MSRP at $317 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 20.7% better value on MSRP (17.3 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4700EQ is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-2600KCore i7-4700EQ
1080p
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS135 FPS
high114 FPS105 FPS
ultra92 FPS85 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium118 FPS116 FPS
high93 FPS89 FPS
ultra75 FPS72 FPS
4K
low64 FPS66 FPS
medium57 FPS60 FPS
high45 FPS46 FPS
ultra35 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-2600KCore i7-4700EQ
1080p
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS135 FPS
high137 FPS132 FPS
ultra126 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS122 FPS
high137 FPS113 FPS
ultra112 FPS90 FPS
4K
low133 FPS108 FPS
medium118 FPS98 FPS
high96 FPS78 FPS
ultra69 FPS57 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-2600KCore i7-4700EQ
1080p
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS135 FPS
high137 FPS135 FPS
ultra137 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS135 FPS
high137 FPS135 FPS
ultra137 FPS135 FPS
4K
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS135 FPS
high137 FPS135 FPS
ultra137 FPS135 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-2600KCore i7-4700EQ
1080p
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS135 FPS
high137 FPS135 FPS
ultra137 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS135 FPS
high137 FPS135 FPS
ultra137 FPS135 FPS
4K
low137 FPS135 FPS
medium137 FPS135 FPS
high137 FPS135 FPS
ultra137 FPS135 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2600K and Core i7-4700EQ

Intel

Core i7-2600K

The Core i7-2600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,484 points. Launch price was $317.

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2600K and Core i7-4700EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600K versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-2600K uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2600K scores 5,484 against the Core i7-4700EQ's 5,417 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-2600K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2600K vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ.

FeatureCore i7-2600KCore i7-4700EQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+12%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+42%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
5,484+1%
5,417
Geekbench 6 Single
707
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2600K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-2600KCore i7-4700EQ
Socket
LGA1155
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-2600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-2600K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2600K) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4700EQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600K targets Gaming Desktop, Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600K rivals FX-8150.

FeatureCore i7-2600KCore i7-4700EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming Desktop
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-2600K launched at $317 MSRP, while the Core i7-4700EQ debuted at $378. On MSRP ($317 vs $378), the Core i7-2600K is $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2600K delivers 17.3 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700EQ — making the Core i7-2600K the 18.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-2600KCore i7-4700EQ
MSRP
$317-16%
$378
Performance per Dollar
17.3+21%
14.3
Release Date
2011
2013