
Core i7-2600K

Xeon W-2104
Core i7-2600K vs Xeon W-2104 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2600K vs Xeon W-2104 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2600K vs Xeon W-2104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2600K
2011Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Xeon W-2104 needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2104.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (5,484 vs 5,530).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($317 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
Xeon W-2104
2017Why buy it
- β +0.8% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $23 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $317 MSRP).
- β Delivers 8.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 17.3 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $317 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-2600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-2600K.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2104 better than Core i7-2600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2600K vs Xeon W-2104 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2600K
The Core i7-2600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,484 points. Launch price was $317.

Xeon W-2104
The Xeon W-2104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,530 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2600K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon W-2104's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600K versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2104 β a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-2600K uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W-2104 uses Skylake (server) (2017β2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2600K scores 5,484 against the Xeon W-2104's 5,530 β a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-2104. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2600K vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2104.
| Feature | Core i7-2600K | Xeon W-2104 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8.25 MB (total)+3% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | Skylake (server) (2017β2018) |
| PassMark | 5,484 | 5,530 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 707 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2600K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W-2104 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2600K | Xeon W-2104 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-2600K) / not specified (Xeon W-2104). The Core i7-2600K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon W-2104 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600K rivals FX-8150.
| Feature | Core i7-2600K | Xeon W-2104 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 3000 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x | β |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2600K was priced at $317, while the Xeon W-2104 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($317 vs $294), Xeon W-2104 was $23 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2600K delivers 17.3 pts/$ vs 18.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2104 β making the Xeon W-2104 the 8.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2600K | Xeon W-2104 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $317 | $294-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.3 | 18.8+9% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














