Core i7-2600K vs N150

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2600K vs N150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2600K vs N150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2600K

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while N150 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike N150.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $317 MSRP, while N150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while N150 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N150

2025

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,418 vs 5,484).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-2600K.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2600K better than N150?

Yes. Core i7-2600K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2600K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2600K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2600K is the better buy right now. Core i7-2600K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $317 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

N150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2011) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-2600K vs N150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2600K

The Core i7-2600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,484 points. Launch price was $317.

N150

The N150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,418 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2600K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the N150's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600K versus 3.6 GHz on the N150 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600K. The Core i7-2600K is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-2600K scores 5,484 against the N150's 5,418 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-2600K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2600K vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N150.

Feature	Core i7-2600K	N150
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+6%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm	Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	5,484+1%	5,418
Geekbench 6 Single	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2600K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the N150 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2600K	N150
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-2600K) / not specified (N150). The Core i7-2600K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the N150 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600K rivals FX-8150.