Core i7-2635QM vs PRO A10-8770

Core i7-2635QM vs PRO A10-8770 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2635QM

4 / 8

3,541

0.0%

3,547

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2635QM vs PRO A10-8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2635QM vs PRO A10-8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2635QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while PRO A10-8770 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,541 vs 3,547).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while PRO A10-8770 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A10-8770

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2635QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8770 better than Core i7-2635QM?

Yes. PRO A10-8770 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A10-8770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8770 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. PRO A10-8770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-2635QM only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2635QM vs PRO A10-8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2635QM

The Core i7-2635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,541 points. Launch price was $378.

PRO A10-8770

The PRO A10-8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,547 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2635QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A10-8770's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2635QM versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-8770 — a 26.9% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-2635QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A10-8770 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2635QM scores 3,541 against the PRO A10-8770's 3,547 — a 0.2% lead for the PRO A10-8770.

Feature	Core i7-2635QM	PRO A10-8770
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	3,541	3,547

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2635QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A10-8770 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2635QM	PRO A10-8770
Socket	FCBGA1224	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-2635QM) / not specified (PRO A10-8770). The Core i7-2635QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A10-8770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2635QM targets Mobile.