Core i7-2635QM vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Intel

Core i7-2635QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-2635QM vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2635QM vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2635QM vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2635QM

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Ryzen Embedded V1202B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 35.1 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $278 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Delivers 274.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.1 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2635QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,512 vs 3,541).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2635QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2635QM better than Ryzen Embedded V1202B?
Yes. Core i7-2635QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2635QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2635QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-2635QM is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-2635QM comes in 278.0% more expensive on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1202B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.1% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V1202B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-2635QM vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-2635QM

The Core i7-2635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,541 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

The Ryzen Embedded V1202B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,512 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2635QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2635QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2635QM versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V1202B (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-2635QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2635QM scores 3,541 against the Ryzen Embedded V1202B's 3,512 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-2635QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2635QM vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMRyzen Embedded V1202B
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
3,541
3,512
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2635QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMRyzen Embedded V1202B
Socket
FCBGA1224
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-2635QM) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1202B). The Core i7-2635QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2635QM targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMRyzen Embedded V1202B
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-2635QM was priced at $378, while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B came in at $100. On launch pricing ($378 vs $100), Ryzen Embedded V1202B was $278 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2635QM delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 35.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1202B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1202B the 115.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMRyzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP
$378
$100-74%
Performance per Dollar
9.4
35.1+273%
Release Date
2011
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.