
Core i7-2637M

Pentium G3450T
Core i7-2637M vs Pentium G3450T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2637M vs Pentium G3450T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2637M vs Pentium G3450T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2637M
2011Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium G3450T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,889 vs 1,904).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 25.4 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
Pentium G3450T
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 288.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.4 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G3450T better than Core i7-2637M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2637M vs Pentium G3450T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2637M
The Core i7-2637M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,889 points. Launch price was $289.

Pentium G3450T
The Pentium G3450T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,904 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2637M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G3450T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-2637M versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G3450T — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G3450T (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-2637M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G3450T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2637M scores 1,889 against the Pentium G3450T's 1,904 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium G3450T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 614, a 54.8% lead for the Pentium G3450T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2637M vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3450T.
| Feature | Core i7-2637M | Pentium G3450T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,889 | 1,904 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 350 | 614+75% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 628 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2637M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3450T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i7-2637M versus DDR3-1600 on the Pentium G3450T — the Pentium G3450T supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G3450T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i7-2637M) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Pentium G3450T).
| Feature | Core i7-2637M | Pentium G3450T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | DDR3-1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2637M) vs Yes (Pentium G3450T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2637M) and Intel HD Graphics (Pentium G3450T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-2637M | Pentium G3450T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2637M was priced at $289, while the Pentium G3450T came in at $75. On launch pricing ($289 vs $75), Pentium G3450T was $214 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2637M delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 25.4 pts/$ for the Pentium G3450T — making the Pentium G3450T the 118.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2637M | Pentium G3450T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $75-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 25.4+291% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














