
Core i7-2700K

Xeon E3-1220 v5
Core i7-2700K vs Xeon E3-1220 v5 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2700K vs Xeon E3-1220 v5 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2700K vs Xeon E3-1220 v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2700K
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Xeon E3-1220 v5 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1220 v5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,689 vs 5,713).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 28.1 PassMark/$ ($332 MSRP vs $203 MSRP).
- ❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
Xeon E3-1220 v5
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($203 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.1 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($203 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-2700K.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1220 v5 better than Core i7-2700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2700K vs Xeon E3-1220 v5 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2700K
The Core i7-2700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,689 points. Launch price was $514.

Xeon E3-1220 v5
The Xeon E3-1220 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,713 points. Launch price was $203.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2700K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1220 v5's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-2700K versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v5 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-2700K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-2700K uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2700K scores 5,689 against the Xeon E3-1220 v5's 5,713 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1220 v5. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-2700K | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+11% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Skylake-DT (2015) |
| PassMark | 5,689 | 5,713 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 701 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2700K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2700K | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-2700K) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220 v5). The Core i7-2700K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2700K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2700K rivals FX-8150.
| Feature | Core i7-2700K | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2700K was priced at $332, while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 came in at $203. On launch pricing ($332 vs $203), Xeon E3-1220 v5 was $129 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2700K delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 28.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220 v5 — making the Xeon E3-1220 v5 the 48.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2700K | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $332 | $203-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.1 | 28.1+64% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














