Core i7-2860QM
VS
Core i5-3450

Core i7-2860QM vs Core i5-3450

Intel

Core i7-2860QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-3450

4 Cores4 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2860QM is positioned at rank 68 and the Core i5-3450 is on rank 696, so the Core i7-2860QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2860QM

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
91%
#56
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
223%
#57
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
220%
#58
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
202%
#59
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
201%
#60
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
199%
#62
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
192%
#63
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
185%
#64
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
184%
#65
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
179%
#68
Core i7-2860QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
98%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
95%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3450

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12697%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11998%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8711%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2624%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2079%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1818%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1042%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1028%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
936%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
936%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
925%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
900%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
888%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
884%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
876%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
97%
#695
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
100%
#696
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
100%
#697
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#699
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#700
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#701
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#702
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#703
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
98%
#704
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#705
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#708
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
97%
#710
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-3450 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2860QM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2860QMCore i5-3450
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2860QMCore i5-3450
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2860QM and Core i5-3450

Intel

Core i7-2860QM

The Core i7-2860QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,597 points. Launch price was $568.

Intel

Core i5-3450

The Core i5-3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,517 points. Launch price was $186.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2860QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-3450's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-2860QM versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3450 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-2860QM (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-2860QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3450 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2860QM scores 4,597 against the Core i5-3450's 4,517 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i7-2860QM. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2860QM vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-3450.

FeatureCore i7-2860QMCore i5-3450
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+3%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,597+2%
4,517
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2860QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3450 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-2860QMCore i5-3450
Socket
PGA988
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1600
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2860QM) and Intel HD Graphics 2500 (Core i5-3450) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2860QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-2860QMCore i5-3450
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
true