Core i7-3610QM vs Xeon E3-1505L v5

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3610QM vs Xeon E3-1505L v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3610QM vs Xeon E3-1505L v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3610QM

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon E3-1505L v5 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1505L v5 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.

Xeon E3-1505L v5

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3610QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,083 vs 5,132).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3610QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3610QM better than Xeon E3-1505L v5?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1505L v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3610QM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3610QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3610QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3610QM is the better buy right now. Core i7-3610QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at $378 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1505L v5 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3610QM vs Xeon E3-1505L v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3610QM

The Core i7-3610QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,132 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E3-1505L v5

The Xeon E3-1505L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,083 points. Launch price was $433.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3610QM and Xeon E3-1505L v5 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QM versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505L v5 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-3610QM (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-3610QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1505L v5 uses Skylake-H (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3610QM scores 5,132 against the Xeon E3-1505L v5's 5,083 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-3610QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3610QM vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1505L v5.

Feature	Core i7-3610QM	Xeon E3-1505L v5
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+18%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Skylake-H (2015−2016)
PassMark	5,132	5,083
Geekbench 6 Single	800	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3610QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1505L v5 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3610QM	Xeon E3-1505L v5
Socket	PGA988	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QM) / not specified (Xeon E3-1505L v5). The Core i7-3610QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E3-1505L v5 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QM targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3610QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.