Core i7-3630QM
VS
Atom x7405C

Core i7-3630QM vs Atom x7405C

Intel

Core i7-3630QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Atom x7405C

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3630QM is positioned at rank 1007 and the Atom x7405C is on rank 180, so the Atom x7405C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3630QM

#995
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2159%
#996
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2127%
#997
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1953%
#998
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1944%
#999
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1926%
#1001
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1860%
#1002
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1784%
#1003
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1781%
#1004
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1733%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1009
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#1010
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
100%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
99%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
98%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
97%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
96%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
93%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7405C

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
100%
#168
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
354%
#169
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
349%
#170
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
320%
#171
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
319%
#172
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
316%
#174
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
305%
#175
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
293%
#176
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
292%
#177
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
284%
#180
Atom x7405C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#193
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
98%
#195
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7405C (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-3630QMAtom x7405C
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3630QM (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-3630QMAtom x7405C
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3630QM and Atom x7405C

Intel

Core i7-3630QM

The Core i7-3630QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,136 points. Launch price was $284.

Intel

Atom x7405C

The Atom x7405C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,218 points. Launch price was $57.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3630QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Atom x7405C's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-3630QM versus 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7405C — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-3630QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom x7405C uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3630QM scores 5,136 against the Atom x7405C's 5,218 — a 1.6% lead for the Atom x7405C. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-3630QMAtom x7405C
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+41%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
22 nm
10 nm-55%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark
5,136
5,218+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
600
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3630QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7405C uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3630QM versus DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7405C — the Atom x7405C supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3630QM supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-3630QM) vs 1 (Atom x7405C). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3630QM) vs 9 (Atom x7405C) — the Core i7-3630QM offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,HM77,QM77 (Core i7-3630QM) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7405C).

FeatureCore i7-3630QMAtom x7405C
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR5-4800+67%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+78%
9
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-3630QM) / not specified (Atom x7405C). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3630QM) and Intel UHD Graphics (Atom x7405C) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3630QM targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3630QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.

FeatureCore i7-3630QMAtom x7405C
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop