Core i7-3632QM vs N200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3632QM vs N200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3632QM vs N200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3632QM

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while N200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1224, while N200 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N200

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1224 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3632QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,729 vs 4,754).
❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Core i7-3632QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3632QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3632QM better than N200?

Yes. Core i7-3632QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3632QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3632QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3632QM is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-3632QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. N200 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 12.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

N200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1224. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-3632QM vs N200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3632QM

The Core i7-3632QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,754 points. Launch price was $359.

N200

The N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 4,729 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-3632QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the N200's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3632QM versus 3.7 GHz on the N200 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the N200. The Core i7-3632QM is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-3632QM scores 4,754 against the N200's 4,729 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-3632QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3632QM vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N200.

Feature	Core i7-3632QM	N200
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm	Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	—
PassMark	4,754	4,729

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3632QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3632QM	N200
Socket	FCBGA1224	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-3632QM) / not specified (N200). The Core i7-3632QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the N200 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3632QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.