Core i7-3687U
VS
Core i5-680

Core i7-3687U vs Core i5-680

Intel

Core i7-3687U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-680

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.86 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3687U is positioned at rank 654 and the Core i5-680 is on rank 1014, so the Core i7-3687U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3687U

#642
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
896%
#643
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
882%
#644
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
810%
#645
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
806%
#646
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
799%
#648
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
772%
#649
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
740%
#650
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
739%
#651
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
719%
#654
Core i7-3687U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
98%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-680

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34985%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
33057%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24002%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7231%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5728%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5011%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2870%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2832%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2579%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2579%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2550%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2481%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2446%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2436%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2414%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
100%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
100%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
98%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
97%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
97%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
97%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
95%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
94%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
91%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
91%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-680 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-3687U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-3687UCore i5-680
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-3687UCore i5-680
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3687U and Core i5-680

Intel

Core i7-3687U

The Core i7-3687U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,621 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-680

The Core i5-680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,620 points. Launch price was $272.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3687U and Core i5-680 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3687U versus 3.86 GHz on the Core i5-680 — a 15.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-680 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-3687U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-680 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3687U scores 2,621 against the Core i5-680's 2,620 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-3687U. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-3687UCore i5-680
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.86 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,621
2,620
Geekbench 6 Single
640
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,240
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3687U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-680 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Core i7-3687U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-3687UCore i5-680
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3687U) and HD Graphics (Core i5-680) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3687U targets Enthusiast, Core i5-680 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3687U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.

FeatureCore i7-3687UCore i5-680
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Enthusiast
Desktop