
Core i7-3770K

Xeon E5-2637 v2
Core i7-3770K vs Xeon E5-2637 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3770K vs Xeon E5-2637 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3770K vs Xeon E5-2637 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3770K
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 77W instead of 130W, a 53W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $332 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2637 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2637 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,492 vs 6,495).
- ❌68.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 77W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3770K better than Xeon E5-2637 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3770K vs Xeon E5-2637 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3770K
The Core i7-3770K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,495 points. Launch price was $294.

Xeon E5-2637 v2
The Xeon E5-2637 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,492 points. Launch price was $1,090.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-3770K and Xeon E5-2637 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770K versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v2 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-3770K uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770K scores 6,495 against the Xeon E5-2637 v2's 6,492 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-3770K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3770K vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2637 v2.
| Feature | Core i7-3770K | Xeon E5-2637 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 6,495 | 6,492 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3770K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3770K | Xeon E5-2637 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













