Core i7-3840QM
VS
Core i5-7600T

Core i7-3840QM vs Core i5-7600T

Intel

Core i7-3840QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-7600T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3840QM is positioned at rank 238 and the Core i5-7600T is on rank 591, so the Core i7-3840QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3840QM

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
98%
#226
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
400%
#227
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
394%
#228
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
362%
#229
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
360%
#230
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
357%
#232
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
344%
#233
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
330%
#234
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
330%
#235
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
321%
#238
Core i7-3840QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7600T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10271%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9705%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7046%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2123%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1681%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1471%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
843%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
831%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
757%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
757%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
749%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
728%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
718%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
715%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
709%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
100%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
100%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
99%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
99%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
99%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
98%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
98%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
97%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
97%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
97%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7600T (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-3840QMCore i5-7600T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3840QM (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-3840QMCore i5-7600T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3840QM and Core i5-7600T

Intel

Core i7-3840QM

The Core i7-3840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,871 points. Launch price was $568.

Intel

Core i5-7600T

The Core i5-7600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,827 points. Launch price was $224.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3840QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-7600T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3840QM versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-7600T — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3840QM (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-3840QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-7600T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3840QM scores 5,871 against the Core i5-7600T's 5,827 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-3840QM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 676 vs 1,243, a 59.1% lead for the Core i5-7600T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3840QM vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600T.

FeatureCore i7-3840QMCore i5-7600T
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+3%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
5,871
5,827
Geekbench 6 Single
676
1,243+84%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3840QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7600T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3840QM versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7600T — the Core i5-7600T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7600T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3840QM) and B250,H270,Z270 (Core i5-7600T).

FeatureCore i7-3840QMCore i5-7600T
Socket
PGA988
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3840QM) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7600T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3840QM targets Mobile Workstation, Core i5-7600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3840QM rivals A10-5750M; Core i5-7600T rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.

FeatureCore i7-3840QMCore i5-7600T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mobile Workstation
Low Power Desktop