Core i7-3840QM vs Core i7-4770T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3840QM vs Core i7-4770T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3840QM vs Core i7-4770T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3840QM

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Core i7-4770T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-4770T

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,854 vs 5,871).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Core i7-3840QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3840QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3840QM better than Core i7-4770T?

Yes. Core i7-3840QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3840QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3840QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3840QM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-3840QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-4770T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4770T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3840QM vs Core i7-4770T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3840QM

The Core i7-3840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,871 points. Launch price was $568.

Core i7-4770T

The Core i7-4770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,854 points. Launch price was $610.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3840QM and Core i7-4770T share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3840QM versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4770T — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3840QM (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-3840QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4770T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3840QM scores 5,871 against the Core i7-4770T's 5,854 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-3840QM. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3840QM vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4770T.

Feature	Core i7-3840QM	Core i7-4770T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,871	5,854
Geekbench 6 Single	676	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3840QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4770T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3840QM	Core i7-4770T
Socket	PGA988	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3840QM) / not specified (Core i7-4770T). The Core i7-3840QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i7-4770T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3840QM targets Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-3840QM rivals A10-5750M.