Core i7-4712HQ vs N100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4712HQ vs N100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4712HQ vs N100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4712HQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,350 vs 5,355).
❌516.7% higher power demand at 37W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on BGA1364, while N100 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N100

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 37W, a 31W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1364 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4712HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Core i7-4712HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is N100 better than Core i7-4712HQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4712HQ is ahead with a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, N100 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i7-4712HQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, N100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

N100 is the better buy right now. N100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $128 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4712HQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (41.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

N100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of BGA1364, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-4712HQ vs N100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4712HQ

The Core i7-4712HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,350 points. Launch price was $378.

N100

The N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,355 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4712HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the N100's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4712HQ versus 3.4 GHz on the N100 — a 3% clock advantage for the N100. The Core i7-4712HQ is built on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-4712HQ scores 5,350 against the N100's 5,355 — a 0.1% lead for the N100. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4712HQ vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N100.

Feature	Core i7-4712HQ	N100
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm	Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	5,350	5,355

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4712HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N100 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.