
Core i7-4712HQ

Xeon E3-1225 v3
Core i7-4712HQ vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4712HQ vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4712HQ vs Xeon E3-1225 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4712HQ
2014Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 37W instead of 84W, a 47W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1225 v3, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1225 v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon E3-1225 v3
2013Why buy it
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics P4600, while Core i7-4712HQ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4712HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (5,324 vs 5,350).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $224 MSRP, while Core i7-4712HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β127% higher power demand at 84W vs 37W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4712HQ better than Xeon E3-1225 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4712HQ vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4712HQ
The Core i7-4712HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013β2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,350 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E3-1225 v3
The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013β2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4712HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1225 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4712HQ versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 β a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1225 v3 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4712HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013β2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013β2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4712HQ scores 5,350 against the Xeon E3-1225 v3's 5,324 β a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-4712HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4712HQ vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225 v3.
| Feature | Core i7-4712HQ | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Crystalwell (2013β2014) | Haswell-WS (2013β2014) |
| PassMark | 5,350 | 5,324 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,108 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 3,324 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4712HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4712HQ | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4712HQ) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1225 v3). The Xeon E3-1225 v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the Core i7-4712HQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1225 v3 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1225 v3 rivals Core i5-4570.
| Feature | Core i7-4712HQ | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | HD Graphics P4600 |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












