Core i7-4750HQ vs Opteron 6238

Core i7-4750HQ vs Opteron 6238 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4750HQ

4 / 8

5,630

+0.1%

5,625

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4750HQ vs Opteron 6238 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4750HQ vs Opteron 6238: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4750HQ

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 47W instead of 115W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6238 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6238, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.

Opteron 6238

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,625 vs 5,630).
❌Launch MSRP is still $455 MSRP, while Core i7-4750HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌144.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4750HQ better than Opteron 6238?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6238 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4750HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4750HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4750HQ is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6238 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4750HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $455 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6238 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6238 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4750HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4750HQ vs Opteron 6238 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4750HQ

The Core i7-4750HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,630 points. Launch price was $434.

Opteron 6238

The Opteron 6238 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,625 points. Launch price was $455.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4750HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6238 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6238 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4750HQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6238 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-4750HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6238 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4750HQ scores 5,630 against the Opteron 6238's 5,625 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-4750HQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4750HQ	Opteron 6238
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	5,630	5,625

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4750HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6238 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.