Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E

Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4765T

4 / 8

5,028

+1.4%

4,960

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4765T

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8320E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 33.7 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $147 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8320E.

FX-8320E

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $156 less on MSRP ($147 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅Delivers 103.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($147 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4765T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,960 vs 5,028).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8320E better than Core i7-4765T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-8320E is ahead with a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4765T pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4765T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8320E is the better buy right now. FX-8320E comes in $156 cheaper on MSRP at $147 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-4765T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.4% better PassMark. It is also 103.3% better value on MSRP (33.7 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-8320E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4765T

The Core i7-4765T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,028 points. Launch price was $509.

FX-8320E

The FX-8320E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,960 points. Launch price was $147.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4765T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8320E offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8320E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-4765T versus 4 GHz on the FX-8320E — a 28.6% clock advantage for the FX-8320E (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4765T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-8320E uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4765T scores 5,028 against the FX-8320E's 4,960 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-4765T.

Feature	Core i7-4765T	FX-8320E
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8192 kB+3100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	5,028+1%	4,960
Geekbench 6 Single	—	439
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,734

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4765T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8320E uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4765T	FX-8320E
Socket	LGA1150	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4765T) / AMD-V (FX-8320E).

Feature	Core i7-4765T	FX-8320E
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4765T was priced at $303, while the FX-8320E came in at $147. On launch pricing ($303 vs $147), FX-8320E was $156 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4765T delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 33.7 pts/$ for the FX-8320E — making the FX-8320E the 68.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4765T	FX-8320E
MSRP	$303	$147-51%
Performance per Dollar	16.6	33.7+103%
Release Date	2013	2014

Search Core i7-4765T on Amazon

Search FX-8320E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.