Atom C3858 vs Core i7-4765T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3858 vs Core i7-4765T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3858 vs Core i7-4765T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3858

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-4765T

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3858 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,028 vs 5,040).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Atom C3858 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3858 better than Core i7-4765T?

Yes. Atom C3858 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom C3858 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3858 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3858 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom C3858 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-4765T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3858 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013), 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom C3858 vs Core i7-4765T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3858

The Atom C3858 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $332.

Core i7-4765T

The Core i7-4765T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,028 points. Launch price was $509.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3858 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-4765T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3858 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3858 versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-4765T — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-4765T (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom C3858 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4765T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3858 scores 5,040 against the Core i7-4765T's 5,028 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom C3858. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3858 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4765T.

Feature	Atom C3858	Core i7-4765T
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3 GHz+50%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB+50%	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB+4700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,040	5,028

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3858 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4765T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom C3858	Core i7-4765T
Socket	FCBGA1310	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—