Atom C3858
VS
Core i7-3610QM

Atom C3858 vs Core i7-3610QM

Intel

Atom C3858

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-3610QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3858 is positioned at rank 310 and the Core i7-3610QM is on rank 1008, so the Atom C3858 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3858

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4536%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
856%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
761%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
588%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
99%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
98%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
98%
#310
Atom C3858
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3610QM

#996
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2161%
#997
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2129%
#998
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1954%
#999
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1946%
#1000
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1928%
#1002
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1862%
#1003
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1785%
#1004
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1782%
#1005
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1734%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1009
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#1010
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
100%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
99%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
98%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
97%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
97%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
93%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3858 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3858Core i7-3610QM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3610QM (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3858Core i7-3610QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3858 and Core i7-3610QM

Intel

Atom C3858

The Atom C3858 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $332.

Intel

Core i7-3610QM

The Core i7-3610QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,132 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Atom C3858 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-3610QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3858 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3858 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QM — a 49.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-3610QM (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Atom C3858 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3610QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3858 scores 5,040 against the Core i7-3610QM's 5,132 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i7-3610QM. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3858 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3610QM.

FeatureAtom C3858Core i7-3610QM
Cores / Threads
12 / 12+200%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.3 GHz+65%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
12 MB+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
12 MB+4700%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
5,040
5,132+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
800
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3858 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3610QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3858 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3610QM — the Atom C3858 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3858 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3858) vs 16 (Core i7-3610QM) — the Core i7-3610QM offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3858) and HM77,QM77 (Core i7-3610QM).

FeatureAtom C3858Core i7-3610QM
Socket
FCBGA1310
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+700%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3858) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QM). The Core i7-3610QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Atom C3858 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QM targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3610QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.

FeatureAtom C3858Core i7-3610QM
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High Performance Laptop