Core i7-4765T vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Core i7-4765T vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4765T

4 / 8

5,028

+1.3%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

6 / 6

4,965

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4765T vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4765T vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4765T

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4765T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,965 vs 5,028).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4765T better than Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)?

Yes. Core i7-4765T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4765T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4765T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4765T is the better buy right now. Core i7-4765T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $303 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4765T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4765T vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4765T

The Core i7-4765T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,028 points. Launch price was $509.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,965 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4765T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-4765T versus 3.3 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-4765T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4765T scores 5,028 against the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)'s 4,965 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-4765T. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4765T vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

Feature	Core i7-4765T	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Thuban (2010)
PassMark	5,028+1%	4,965

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4765T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.