Core i7-4770S vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Intel

Core i7-4770S

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4770S vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4770S vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4770S vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4770S

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($305 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $155 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $305 MSRP).
  • Delivers 102.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.8 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $305 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4770S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 6,749).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4770S better than Ryzen Embedded V1605B?
Yes. Core i7-4770S is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4770S is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4770S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-4770S is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-4770S comes in 103.3% more expensive on MSRP at $305 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1605B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.9% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V1605B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4770S vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4770S

The Core i7-4770S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,749 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4770S and Ryzen Embedded V1605B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770S versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4770S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-4770S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770S scores 6,749 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-4770S. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4770S vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

FeatureCore i7-4770SRyzen Embedded V1605B
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+8%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+55%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)+300%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
6,749
6,724
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4770S uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4770SRyzen Embedded V1605B
Socket
LGA1150
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4770S was priced at $305, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($305 vs $150), Ryzen Embedded V1605B was $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770S delivers 22.1 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1605B the 67.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4770SRyzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP
$305
$150-51%
Performance per Dollar
22.1
44.8+103%
Release Date
2013
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.