Core i7-4940MX vs Opteron 6380

Core i7-4940MX vs Opteron 6380 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4940MX

4 / 8

6,783

+1.4%

6,687

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4940MX vs Opteron 6380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4940MX vs Opteron 6380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4940MX

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 57W instead of 115W, a 58W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6380, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6380

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,687 vs 6,783).
❌Launch MSRP is still $551 MSRP, while Core i7-4940MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌101.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 57W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4940MX better than Opteron 6380?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4940MX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4940MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4940MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4940MX is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6380 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4940MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $551 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6380 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4940MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4940MX vs Opteron 6380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4940MX

The Core i7-4940MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,783 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Opteron 6380

The Opteron 6380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,687 points. Launch price was $1,150.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4940MX packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6380 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6380 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-4940MX versus 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6380 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-4940MX (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-4940MX uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6380 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4940MX scores 6,783 against the Opteron 6380's 6,687 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-4940MX. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4940MX	Opteron 6380
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+24%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+1500%	16 MB
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	6,783+1%	6,687

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4940MX uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6380 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.