Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded R2514

Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded R2514 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4940MX

4 / 8

6,783

+0.8%

6,731

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded R2514 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded R2514: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4940MX

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌280% higher power demand at 57W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 57W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4940MX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,731 vs 6,783).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4940MX better than Ryzen Embedded R2514?

Yes. Core i7-4940MX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4940MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4940MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4940MX still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-4940MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded R2514 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4940MX

The Core i7-4940MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,783 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4940MX and Ryzen Embedded R2514 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-4940MX versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4940MX (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-4940MX uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4940MX scores 6,783 against the Ryzen Embedded R2514's 6,731 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-4940MX. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4940MX vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514.

Feature	Core i7-4940MX	Ryzen Embedded R2514
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+8%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+48%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm	12 nm-45%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	6,783	6,731

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4940MX uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.