Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4940MX

4 / 8

6,783

+0.9%

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 / 8

6,724

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4940MX

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌280% higher power demand at 57W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 57W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4940MX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 6,783).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i7-4940MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4940MX better than Ryzen Embedded V1605B?

Yes. Core i7-4940MX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4940MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4940MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4940MX is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-4940MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1605B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V1605B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4940MX vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4940MX

The Core i7-4940MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,783 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4940MX and Ryzen Embedded V1605B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-4940MX versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4940MX (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-4940MX uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4940MX scores 6,783 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-4940MX. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4940MX vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

Feature	Core i7-4940MX	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+55%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+300%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	6,783	6,724

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4940MX uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.